← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5336/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Fundabee Pathan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Nalwandi v. The State Of Maharashtra

2018-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

(1) WP No.5336/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 5336 OF 2013 Fundabee Pathan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Nalwandi, Taluka patoda, Dist. Beed.

Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

Respondent.

*** Mr. S.S. Wagh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the respondent - State. *** CORAM :

T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.

Dated :

19.01.2018.

ORDER :- 1.

Heard both the sides. Seen the communication of the State Government, concerned department dated 10.03.2010. It appears that though the proposal of the present petitioner was submitted in the year 2004, subsequently in December-2008 some new Bal Gruhas were sanctioned by the Government under the said project. But after that no such sanction was given and the Government was reconsidering the project. The communication shows that after formation of new scheme or project and after taking policy decision, the Government can take decision if any new proposal is received.

(2) WP No.5336/2013 2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has information that now some scheme is framed, new scheme has come in existence. In that case the petitioner will be entitled to make new proposal and if there is such project in existence, the respondent is to consider it as per the conditions of the said Scheme. If the Scheme is in existence and a proposal is made, after receipt of the proposal, it is to be decided within six months.

3.

The Petition is disposed of.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/