← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9550/2017delay condonatedrejected

Venkat Tukaram Gundare And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2022-07-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 905 CA-9550.2017.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9550 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16466 OF 2017 Venkat Tukaram Gundare and and another Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents ...

Mr. S.S. Chillarge, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE DATED :

27.07.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants/ claimants as well as learned A.G.P. The respondent No. 2Acquiring Body, despite service, remained absent. 2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 1430 days in fling this appeal. The applicant has attributed the delay to his poor fnancial condition. Moreover the learned Counsel for the applicant submits that though the impugned award is dated 26 February 2013, but the Acquiring Body deposited the amount in the year 2017. Admittedly, there appears substantial delay in fling this frst appeal. However,

(2) 905 CA-9550.2017.odt considering the statutory right of the applicant, it can be condoned in the interest of justice. Accordingly, Civil Application No. 9550 of 2017 is hereby allowed and the delay of 1430 days in fling the frst appeal against the judgment and award dated 26 February 2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Udgir in LAR No. 2315 of 2010 (old LAR No. 444 of 2009) subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any statutory interest in respect of the aforesaid delay period of 1430 days. No costs. 3.

The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. 4.

The First Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde