Anil Vishnu Salve v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:14271

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 BAIL APPLICATION NO.899 OF 2025 ANIL VISHNU SALVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Adv.Pratiksha Magre h/f. Mr.A.N.Barhate Patil APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.R.P.Gaur ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

[VACATION COURT] DATE : 16.05.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is seeking bail as he is arrested on 14.04.2025 in connection with Crime No. I-395/2025, registered with Shrirampur City Police Station, Taluka Shrirampur, District Ahmednagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 119 (1) (2), 118 (1), 115 (2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3] It is alleged in the FIR that the accused persons have assaulted the informant and also snatched money from his pocket.

4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the name of the applicant is not mentioned in the FIR and that the name of some other person namely Gavaliram Salve is mentioned in the FIR. He further submits that even the role of Gavaliram Salve is that he has assaulted the informant by means of sticks and fist and blows. 5] The applicant is arrested on 14.04.2025 and since then the applicant is in jail. There is no recovery at the instance of the applicant. Considering the nature of allegations against the applicant, further custody of the applicant is not necessary.

6] In view of the above, the application is allowed in the following terms :

a] The applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No. I-395/2025, registered with Shrirampur City Police Station, Taluka Shrirampur, District Ahmednagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 119 (1) (2), 118 (1), 115 (2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

b] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall not contact the informant, in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the trial. c] The applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and he shall attend each and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court.

d] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution and he shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

e] The applicant, upon being released on bail, shall place on record of the trial Court the details of his Contact Number and residential address with updates in case of any change.

7] Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

8] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC