Dropadi Uttamrao Gadgile v. Abhimanyu Kale

cp261.15 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 261 OF 2015 IN WP/7314/2014 DROPADI UTTAMRAO GADGILE

VERSUS

ABHIMANYU KALE ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Chavan Sanjaykumar B. Advocate for Respondents : Mrs. Y.M. Kshirsagar .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 6th AUGUST, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

Mr. Chavan, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that in fact the respondents did not hear the petitioner before passing the said order.

2.

As per the respondents, the petitioner was heard and thereafter the order is passed on 7.7.2015.

3.

According to the petitioner, the said order is never communicated to the petitioner and for the first time the same is being shown to this court. This court had directed the respondents to decide the appeal. The appeal is decided though belatedly. The contempt stands purged. The petitioner is at liberty to assail the order

cp261.15 -2passed by the appellate authority on 7.7.2015 in appropriate proceeding, as is permissible in law. Contempt petition stands disposed of. No costs.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) rlj/