Vaishwik Manav Seva Sanstha Through Its President v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
RTE p2 to p5.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 8003 OF 2025 Vaishwik Manav Seva Sanstha Through Its President ....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretarya and Others .....Respondent .....
Mr. M. M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4. .....
AND 3 WRIT PETITION NO. 8005 OF 2025 Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Vikas Pratisthan Majalgaon Through Its Secretary ....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others .....Respondent .....
Mr. M. M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4. .....
AND 4 WRIT PETITION NO. 8006 OF 2025 Vaishwik Manav Seva Sanstha Through Its President ....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others .....Respondent .....
Mr. M. M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.M. Phule, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4. .....
AND 5 WRIT PETITION NO. 8069 OF 2025 Vishal Bahu Uddeshiya Pratisthan Paithan Through Its President ....Petitioner [1]
RTE p2 to p5.odt
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others .....Respondent .....
Mr. M. M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondents Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4. .....
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 20 NOVEMBER 2025 ORDER :
.
Not on board. Upon mentioning, matters are taken on board. 2.
All these are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the respective petitioners/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 3.
We have heard both the sides.
4.
We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners' proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decisions as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]