Yashoda W/O Maroti Hatkadke v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

APPLN2876.2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2876 OF 2015 Yashoda w/o Maroti Katkadke ... Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents ..........

Mr V. M. Maney, Advocate for the applicant Mrs M. A. Deshpande, APP for respondent/State .............

CORAM :

N. W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2015.

PER COURT:

.

Heard Mr V. M. Maney, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mrs M. A. Deshpande, learned APP for respondent/State. 2.

The bail was granted to the non-applicants/accused persons prior to the filing of the charge-sheet. The learned Sessions Court while ordering grant of bail on 19th May, 2015, has noted that there does not appear to be a direct involvement of the non-applicants No. 2 to 4 in the commission of crime in question.

3.

Upon perusal of the charge-sheet, it is noted that the discovery u/s 27 is noted at the behest of the husband - Maruti whereas;

APPLN2876.2015.odt the FIR reflects the specific role of the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law.

4.

In view thereof, in my opinion, no case for cancellation of regular bail is made out. The application fails and same stands rejected. No costs.

[ N. W. SAMBRE, J. ] sgp