← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6981/2023disposed off

Janvi Kashiram Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2023-10-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

913.CA.6981.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6981 OF 2023 IN WP/6264/2020 Janvi Kashiram Yadav ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary Medical Education and Drugs Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.

The Director of Medical Education and Research Saint George Hospital Compound, Mumbai.

3.

Admission Regulating Authority and Commissioner, the State Common Entrance Test Cell Government of Maharashtra 9th Floor, New Excelsior Building, A.K. Nayak Marg, Fort, Near CSMT, Mumbai.

4.

The Principal, Atal Bihari Bajpai Homoeopathic District - Ahmednagar.

Medical College & Hospital, Deogad Phata, Ahmednagar, 5.

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Nashik through its Registrar, Nashik.

6.

The Central Council for Indian Medicine Jawahar Lal Nehru Bhartiya Chikista Avam Homeopathy Anusandhan Bhawan, 61-65, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, "D" Block, New Delhi-110 058 ...

RESPONDENTS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.K. Kasat h/f. Mr. Sikchi Aditya N. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Mr. A.S. Shinde Advocate for respondent No.3 : Mr. M.D. Narwadkar Advocate for Respondent No.4 in WP : Mr. Dheeraj Jethliya Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. A.S. Bayas Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Ms. Sudha Chintamani (Kulthe) ...

1/2

913.CA.6981.23.odt

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 18.10.2023 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

2.

This is an application seeking restoration of the writ petition dismissed in default for non-removal of the office objection with a prayer to condone the delay. The grounds agitated in the application have gone without any contest. For the reasons mentioned in the application and bearing in mind the nature of the dispute, the application is allowed and the writ petition is restored subject to the condition that the office objection would now be removed within two weeks and the petitioner deposit cost of Rs.2000/- in the office that to within two weeks. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2