The State Of Maharashtra v. Bhupendra Sahebrao Koli

{1} 914-crappeal84.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2023 Suhas Shriram Solanki Appellant

Versus

Bhupendra Sahebrao Koli & another Respondents Mr. P. B. Jadhav, advocate for the Appellant Mr. H. V. Tungar, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.2.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL BY THE STATE NO. 52 OF 2023 The State of Maharashtra Applicant

Versus

Bhupendra Sahebrao Koli Respondent Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for the Applicant Mr. H. V. Tungar, advocate for the Respondent CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 08th September, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

It appears that the appeal fled by the original

{2} 914-crappeal84.23.odt complainant, arising out of same judgment and order, is already registered as Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 2023. Even if the leave is not granted, as prayed by the learned A. P. P., then also the appeal of the complainant will have to be heard on merits. Moreover, if the leave is granted, both the appeals are required to be heard together.

Considering this aspect, the Criminal Application fled by the State for leave to fle appeal is hereby allowed. The State appeal be registered after removing all the offce objections, if any. It is made clear that the leave is not granted considering the merit of the case.

Place both these appeals for admission after registration.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb