Satyadharm Ashok Sathewad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} 42 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6249 OF 2020 SATYADHARM ASHOK SATHEWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3 State : Mr. S. B. Yawalkar ...

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI,JJ.

DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2020.

PER COURT:

1] The learned AGP accepts notice for all respondents. 2] It is submitted that validation proceeding in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending with the scrutiny committee, the same is not decided. Without issuing notice to the petitioner, the respondents have placed the petitioner on the supernumerary post.

3] As the impugned order is passed without notice to the petitioner, we quash and set aside the impugned order. 4] In case the respondents want to take action against the petitioner placing the petitioner on supernumerary post or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to the petitioner, calling upon him to show cause. In that event, the petitioner can fle reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondent-Committee.

{2} 42 sr.no..odt 5] The Committee shall decide the validation proceeding expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months. 6] The petitioner shall appear before the committee on 7th October, 2020, if the circumstances so permit. 7] Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J] grt/-