Arun Ramesh Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12 WRIT PETITION NO. 6304 OF 2018 ARUN RAMESH PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NOS.6340, 6341, 6342, 6343, 6344, 6345, 6346, 6347, 6348, 6349, 6350, 6351, 6352, 6353 OF 2018 ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.P.Shejul And Mr. D. B. Chavan AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. N.T.Bbagat ...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 25, 2018 O R D E R :

1.

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The contention of the learned counsel is that the petitioners had appeared in the selection process, but the petitioners are not being issued the appointment and joining orders.

wp6304.18 2.

Learned AGP raised preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternate remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

3.

In the light of that we are not inclined to consider the matter on merits.

4.

Writ petitions are disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy. All conditions are kept open. No costs.

[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] dbm/