Bombay High CourtCA/6876/2019disposed offdismissed for default

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Jalgaon v. Rohidas @ Aba Jagannath Lambole And ANR

2020-01-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya3 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6866 OF 2019 IN FAST/15703/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

PUNAMCHAND ASARAM MAHAJAN AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 & 2 served.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6872 OF 2019 IN FAST/15700/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

VIJAY NAMDEO MAHAJAN AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 & 2 served.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6874 OF 2019 IN FAST/15686/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

MAHENDRA MANGU MAHAJAN AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 & 2 served.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6876 OF 2019 IN FAST/15697/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

ROHIDAS @ ABA JAGANNATH LAMBOLE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 & 2 served.

- 2 - =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6897 OF 2019 IN FAST/15682/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

PRAMILABAI BUDHA BHOI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 to 3 served.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 26 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6901 OF 2019 IN FAST/15694/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., JALGAON

VERSUS

VINOD RAMESH JADHAV AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Malte Uday S.

Respondent nos.1 & 2 served.

CORAM: V.L. ACHLIYA, J.

DATE: 20.01.2020 PER COURT :

1] The applicant has moved this application seeking condonation of 330 days delay in filing appeals for the reasons set out in detail in the applications. 2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

Respondents though served are absent.

3] On due consideration of the submissions advanced in the light of unchallenged and uncontroverted pleadings made in the applications assigning the cause for condonation of delay, I am of the view that the delay

- 3 - deserves to be condoned.

4] Accordingly, the applications are allowed.

Delay condoned. Appeals be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any.

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) ndk/c2012011.doc