The State Of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Mahadeo Angule

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3418 NO.OF 2014 (The State of Maharashtra Vs. Tanaji Mahadeo Angule) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders Shri B.L. Dhas, A.P.P. for applicant/ State Shri G.V. Patil, advocate for respondent - absent .....

CORAM :

A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED :

24th July, 2015.

1.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the applicant/ State. When the matter was called out at 2.30 p.m., learned counsel for the respondent was not present, hence the matter was kept back. The learned counsel for respondent is absent even when the matter is called out after some time. 2.

Perused record. Considered the reasons recorded by the trial Court for acquitting the accused. Going through the material available, it appears necessary to reconsider the evidence. Leave granted. Application is allowed. Application is converted into appeal.

3.

Appeal is admitted.

4.

Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken against the respondent/ accused in the trial Court.

(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) fmp/cri3418.14