The State Of Maharashtra And Others v. Ankush Bhaguram Suryawanshi And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7956 OF 2017 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.16975 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11871 OF 2015 The State of Maharashtra and others .. APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Ankush Bhaguram Suryawanshi and others.

.. RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.D.R.Kale, AGP for the Applicants-State Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, Advocate for the respondents ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 29.06.2018 ORDER:

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay in filing the Review Application.

2.

The learned AGP appearing for the applicants invites our attention to the cause disclosed in the Application, which according to him is sufficient to condone the delay, and

therefore, prays that the delay in filing Review Application may be condoned.

3.

On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that no sufficient cause has been disclosed in the application for condonation of delay, and delay of 344 days in filing the Review Application remained unexplained on the part of the applicants. He invites our attention to the exposition of law by the Supreme Court in the case of Pundlik Jalam Patil (D) by Lrs. Vs. Exe.Eng.Jalgaon Medium Project & Anr.1 and submits that in the absence of sufficient cause, delay in filing review application may not be condoned.

4.

Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perusal of the averments in the application for condonation of delay, we are not convinced by the reasons stated in the application, however, to meet ends of justice we condone the delay. Accordingly, delay 2008 [6] ALL MR 954

in filing Review Application stands condoned, the Civil Application stands disposed of.

[SANGITRAO S.PATIL] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC