Baliram Sakharam Patil v. The Collector, Jalgaon And Others

1 951 & 952 ca 142-22+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 951 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2022 IN FAST/16275/2021 BALIRAM SAKHARAM PATIL

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Sakshi A. Kale h/f Mr. A.B. Kale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. A. A. Jagatkar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. Deepak B. Rasve h/f Mr. A. D. Pawar ...

AND 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.143 OF 2022 IN FAST/16269/2021 BALIRAM SAKHARAM PATIL AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Sakshi A. Kale h/f Mr. A.B. Kale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. Deepak B. Rasve h/f Mr. A. D. Pawar ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 04/10/2022.

P. C. :

1.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

2.

The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

2 951 & 952 ca 142-22+ 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the application are condoned subject to condition that the claimants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. 4.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. The application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-