← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6462/2025dismissed

Yogeeta Barkoo Harne v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Principal Secretary And Others

2025-05-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:14184-DB W.P. No.6462/2025 :: 1 ::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6462 OF 2025 Yogeeta Barkoo Harne ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. S.B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. D.R. Korade, A.G.P. for State Mr. Nikam, Advocate for R.No.4 and 5 .......

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 O R D E R :

Not on board. Taken on board.

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned A.G.P. waives service of notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Learned advocates Mr. Nikam waives service of notice for respondent Nos.4 and 5.

W.P. No.6462/2025 :: 2 ::

3.

Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 makes a statement that the petitioner would be allowed to fill in Online form, he would be permitted to appear for examination and their result would also be declared in due course. 4.

Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 places on record a Form of revised TAIT examination form. After having gone through the draft Form, the petitioner is satisfied that her grievance stands redressed and as such, nothing survives in the petition.

5.

The petition stands disposed of in view of the statement made by learned Advocates for respondent Nos.4 and 5 and revised examination form.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (R.G. AVACHAT, J.) fmp/-