Raosaheb Mango Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.273 of 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.520 OF 2015.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.P.Brahme, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.N.S.Choudhari, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.K.JADHAV,JJ.

Date : 31.07.2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Choudhari, learned counsel submits that the order of which contempt is alleged is complied. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute. In light of that, contempt stands purged.

3.

The Contempt Petition stands disposed of.

4.

In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken by the Respondents, the petitioner is at liberty to take up appropriate proceedings.

(V.K.JADHAV,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.31.07.2015.

asp/office/Cp273.15