Rampyari Satyanarayan Jaiswal v. Appasaheb Sheshrao Dighule And Others

C.A. 9005-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9005 OF 2022 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (STAMP) No. 15422 of 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4684 OF 2022 Rampyari Wd/o Satyanarayan Jaiswal,

VERSUS

Appasaheb Sheshrao Dighule and others ....

Mr. C.T. Jadhav, h/f S.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent State.

Mr. D. H. Jadhavar Advocate for Respondent/petitioner in W.P. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, ASG/UOI in C.A. No. 9005/2022 Mr. B.M. Dhanure, Advocate for Respondent No.5 in W.P.4684/2022 Mr. D. S. Manorkar, Advocate for respondent No.4. ....

CORAM : Ravindra V. Ghuge & S.G.Dige, JJ DATE : 01.07.2022 PER COURT :- 1.

By this application, the applicant prays for 19 days delay caused in fling the review application. The applicant is actually an intervenor, whose right in the property ( immovable property) which has been acquired, was not espoused before us. Hence an intervention application has also been fled.

C.A. 9005-2022.odt 2.

The learned Advocates for the non applicants do not oppose the application for condonation.

3.

The delay of 19 days is minor. For the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. Review application be registered.

(S. G. Dige ) ( Ravindra V. Ghuge,) JUDGE JUDGE ysk