The Superintendent Of Police Offce Of Superintendent Of Police Rural Aurangabad v. Sonal Sajan Sisode And ORS

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13062 OF 2025 IN FAST/15825/2025 Sonal Sajan Sisode

VERSUS

Chandrakant Ramdas Sable ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay T. Kanawade Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Harsha Lomte h/fMr. Shivaji Nawale AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.B. Jadhav ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6101 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6102 OF 2025 IN/WITH FAST/15825/2025 The Superintendent Of Police Offce Of Superintendent Of Police Rural Aurangabad

VERSUS

Sonal Sajan Sisode And Ors ...

A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Jadhav Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.T.Kanawade Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Mr. Harsha Lomte h/fMr. Shivaji Nawale .....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 27th NOVEMBER 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Civil application No. 13062 of 2025 is filed for withdrawal of the amount deposited as per the impugned judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. Perused the application. Heard learned

-2advocates for both sides. Learned advocate for the respondents strongly objected the application. However, considering the reasons stated in the application and the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant is permitted to withdraw 75% amount out of the deposited amount with accrued interest thereon. 50% amount shall be withdrawn on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and 25% on furnishing solvent surety/security.

2.

The civil application No. 6101 of 2025 is filed for condonation of delay of 11 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3.

Perused the application and heard learned advocates for both sides. Learned advocate for respondents strongly opposed the application. Considering the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the delay caused is not deliberate or intentional. Therefore, the application is allowed. The delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned in the interest of justice. 4.

In so far as civil application No. 6102 of 2025 is concerned, the same is filed seeking stay to the impugned judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that entire amount under award has been deposited in this Court. In view of

-3the same, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and disposed of.

5.

In first appeal, issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 24.12.2025. The learned advocates waive notice for respective respondents.

6.

Call for record and proceedings.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/