← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9207/2012admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Sakhahari Sidha Tikte And ORS v. Udhav Sidha Tikte

2016-11-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages

ca9207-12 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9207 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.16711 OF 2012 Sakhahari Sidha Tikte and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Udhav Sidha Tikte RESPONDENT .......

Mr. S. A. Dhengle, Advocate for the applicants .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Veracity of the reasons is not challenged. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca9207-12