← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7866/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Saudagar Madhav Lahane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

1 wp 7866.18+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7866 OF 2018 SAUDAGAR MADHAV LAHANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Jadhav Prashant B AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 5 & 7 :

Mr. S. B. Yawalkar ...

WRIT PETITION NO.14184 OF 2018 SHAHENAZ BEGUM ANSARSAHEB

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Biradar R. D.

AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 5 :

Mr. S. B. Yawalkar ...

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE:

th JULY, 2019 PER COURT:

1.

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents.

2.

The petitioners are appointed in the year

2 wp 7866.18+ 2004. Admittedly, the schools where the petitioners are appointed are brought on 100% grand in aid after 01.11.2005. The petitioners are seeking benefit of the old pension scheme in view of the judgment of the full bench of this Court dated 30.04.2019 in Writ Petition No. 8387 of 2013. The petitioners would not be entitled for the benefits of the old pension scheme but would be governed by DCPS.

3.

Naturally, the petitioners would be entitled to the benefits of the DCPS scheme.

4.

Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe