← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7376/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Susbhash Ambadas Jadhav v. Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad Under G.M.I.D.C. Aurangabad And Others

2018-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane3 pages

1 CA7376/18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7376 OF 2018 IN FA/2073/2016 SUSBHASH AMBADAS JADHAV

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LIFT IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V.B. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. B.R. Surwase AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. B.V. Virdhe ...

CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 14th JUNE, 2018 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondent-Acquiring Body as well as learned A.G.P. for the respondent-State. Perused the application.

2.

This matter pertains to the compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondentAcquiring Body has deposited the compensation amount in this Court pursuant to the Award passed by the learned Reference Court filed under Section 18 of the

2 CA7376/18 Land Acquisition Act. The learned counsel for the respondent-Acquiring Body has offered Rs.1,610/- per Are, whereas the Reference Court has enhanced the compensation to the tune of Rs.15,000/- per Are, which is exorbitant and excessive.

3.

In view of the nature of subject-matter, it is not in dispute that the land of the applicant has already been acquired by the respondent-State of Maharashtra. Therefore, I do not find any impediment to allow the applicants original claimant to withdraw some part of the compensation amount on certain terms and conditions in order to protect the interest of respondent-Acquiring Body.

4.

Hence, the application is partly allowed. The applicant-original claimant is allowed to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount on furnishing undertaking to the effect that in case any adverse situation arises, applicant would refund the amount so withdrawn as per the directions of this Court. The applicant-original claimant further allowed to withdraw 25% of the balance decretal amount on furnishing bank guarantee of any Nationalized or Scheduled Bank and the remaining 25% balance amount be fixed in F.D.R. account in any Nationalized Bank for a period of two years or till decision of the First Appeal whichever is earlier.

3 CA7376/18 5.

Accordingly, application stands partly allowed in above terms.

( K.K. SONAWANE, J. ) SRM/14/6/18