← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7375/2018admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Santosh Subhash Jadhav v. Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad Under G.M.I.D.C. Aurangabad And Others

2018-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane3 pages

1 CA7375/18&Anr.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7375 OF 2018 IN FA/2070/2016 SANTOSH SUBHASH JADHAV

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LIFT IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD WITH 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7377 OF 2018 IN FA/2057/2016 GANESH SUBHASH JADHAV

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LIFT IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V.B. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. B.R. Surwase AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. S.S. Raut ...

CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 14th JUNE, 2018 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the respondent­Acquiring Body as well as learned A.G.P. for the respondent­State. Perused the application.

2 CA7375/18&Anr.

2.

Both these matters pertains to the compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent­Acquiring Body has deposited the compensation amount in this Court. The learned counsel for the respondent­Acquiring Body has offered Rs.1,610/­ per Are, whereas the Reference Court has enhanced the compensation to the tune of Rs.15,000/­ per Are, which apparently on the face of record seems to be exorbitant and excessive.

3.

In view of the nature of subject­matter, it is not in dispute that the land of the applicants was acquired by the respondent­State of Maharashtra. Therefore, I do not find any impediment to allow the applicants­original claimants to withdraw some part of the compensation amount on certain terms and conditions in order to protect the interest of respondent­Acquiring Body.

4.

Hence, both the applications are partly allowed. The applicants­original claimants are allowed to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount on furnishing undertaking to the effect that in case any adverse situation arises, applicants would refund the amount so withdrawn as per the directions of this Court to the satisfaction of Registrar [Judicial] of this Court. The applicants/original claimants are further allowed to withdraw 25% of the balance amount on

3 CA7375/18&Anr.

furnishing bank guarantee of any Nationalized or Scheduled Bank and rest of the remaining 25% amount be fixed in F.D.R. account in any Nationalized Bank for a period of two years or till decision of the First Appeal whichever is earlier.

5.

Accordingly, application stands partly allowed in above terms.

( K.K. SONAWANE, J. ) SRM/14/6/18