Ramesh Shankarrao Kadam v. The Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 WRIT PETITION NO.5826 OF 2019 RAMESH SHANKARRAO KADAM

VERSUS

THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ...

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5828 OF 2019 RAMESH SHANKARRAO KADAM AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ...

In both the matters:

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sujit A. Patil h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. K.N. Lokhande Ms. Pradnya Talekar, advocate h/f. Talekar and Associates for Respondent No.3 ...

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 11-10-2022 PER COURT :

.

Writ Petition No.5828 of 2019 is not on Board. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is taken on Board.

2.

Ms. Pradnya Talekar, the learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 submits that the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner in revision. During

pendency of the present petitions, the petitioners have availed the alternate remedy of filing a revision before the State Government, which fact was not placed on record by the petitioners. She further submits that the said revision petition has already been decided by the State Government and the order passed by the Minister is already a subject matter of challenge in another writ petition. 3.

Faced with this, Mr. Sujit A. Patil, learned advocate for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petitions. 4.

Leave is granted.

5.

The Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 6.

The issues raised in the present petitions are kept open. ( SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. ) ...

GGP