← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/939/2025dismissed

Sunil Chandar Haldekar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-06-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:14859

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 939 OF 2025 Sunil Chandar Haldekar

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bilolikar Upendra Bapurao APP for Respondents-State: Ms. P. V. Diggikar ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : June 12, 2025.

PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2.

The applicant is seeking bail in connection with FIR No.0303/2024, registered with Biloli Police Station, District Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 115, 352, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case against the applicant and other co-accused is that on 30/10/2024, at around 09:00 p.m., due to a dispute regarding a plot of land, the applicant allegedly assaulted the informant's mother with an axe and caused her death. It is also alleged that the applicant assaulted the informant's brother, causing injuries to him. The incident is stated to have been witnessed by three eyewitnesses, namely, Prashant Lalu Haldekar, Suresh Lalu Haldekar, and Pradip Lalu Haldekar, as well as an injured eyewitness, Yadav Motha Lalu Haldekar.

Page 1 of

953 BA 939-2025 4.

The statements of the witnesses have been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. (now replaced by Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita), and they support the prosecution's version of the incident. The injury certificate placed on record at page No.141 indicates that the deceased suffered four grievous injuries, all allegedly inflicted by the present applicant.

5.

Considering the gravity of the allegations, the nature of the offence, the specific role attributed to the applicant, and the evidence available on record, no case is made out for grant of regular bail. 6.

In view of the above, the bail application stands dismissed. 7.

It is clarified that the observations in this order are confined to the disposal of the present application, and the trial Court shall not be influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.

Page 2 of