Janardhan Ananda Kothale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp 7839.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITIN NO.7839 OF 2018 Janardhan S/o Ananda Kothale Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr.V.P. Latange, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.R. Yadav, AGP for State - Respondent No.1 to 6 Miss. M.U. Kakade Advocate h/f Smt.M.D. Thumbe for respondent No.8 ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JUDGE (Date : 20th March, 2019) PER COURT :- The learned advocate for respondent No.8 submits that, an alternate remedy is available to the petitioner, to prefer a Second Revision, in the light of the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court delivered in the matter of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani versus State of Maharashtra and others (2015 (6) Mh.L.J.915).

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the time spent by the petitioners in this Court, from 13.6.2018 may be considered as a ground for condonation of delay, if the petitioner approaches the revisional authority. In view of the above, this petition is disposed off.

{2} wp 7839.18.odt If the petitioner approaches the revisional authority by filing a second revision, within four weeks from today, the time spent by the petitioner in this Court from 13.6.2018 until four weeks from today would be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE), JUDGE vbd