Bombay High CourtWP/8800/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Abdul Majid Abdul Karim v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8800 OF 2015 ABDUL MAJID ABDUL KARIM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Momin Mustafa AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Shri Korde D.R.

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: September 01, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the document dated 19.2.2013. The petitioner has not challenged any order in this petition going by the prayers set out therein. In paragraph No.3, the petitioner has made a statement that he is challenging the rejection of the appeal by the respondent No.2 - Commissioner, through respondent No.3 - CEO, ZP, Osmanabad. 2.

I find that the appeal which is said to have been preferred by the petitioner on 28.11.2012 has not been decided by the purported order dated 19.3.2013. The document dated 19.3.2013 is the reply of respondent No.3 in the appeal in between the petitioner and respondent No.3. 3.

Learned AGP submits that in the event the appeal is pending, respondent No.2 shall decide the said appeal expeditiously. In the event the appeal is decided and the outcome of the appeal is not communicated to the petitioner, same will be done within three weeks from today. 4.

In the light of the above, this petition is disposed off. The competent authority from the office of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad shall decide the appeal of the petitioner dated 28.11.2012 within eight weeks from today, after intimating the petitioner of the date of hearing and considering the submissions of the petitioner. akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8800 OF 2015 5.

In the event, the said appeal has already been decided, the copy of the order, deciding the said appeal, shall be forthwith served upon the petitioner within three weeks from today. If the said order is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, he shall have the liberty to assail the said order in accordance with the legal remedies available. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d