← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1717/2022admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ex. Engineer, Medium Project Div. Osmanabad Under Gmiedc, Aurangabad And ANR v. Ashok Vishwambhar Deshmukh

2025-03-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1713 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16632 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1714 OF 2022 IN FAST/16632/2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

JAGANNATH PANDURANG KSHIRSAGAR ...

Mr.Rohit B. Surwase h/f. Mr. B.R. Surwase - Advocate for Applicants ....

AND 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1715 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16635 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1716 OF 2022 IN FAST/16635/2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

MANIK GOPAL MANE ...

Mr.Rohit B. Surwase h/f. Mr. B.R. Surwase - Advocate for Applicants ....

AND 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1717 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16611 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1718 OF 2022 IN FAST/16611/2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

ASHOK VISHWAMBHAR DESHMUKH ...

1/3

Mr.Rohit B. Surwase h/f. Mr. B.R. Surwase - Advocate for Applicants ....

AND 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1731 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16629 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1732 OF 2022 IN FAST/16629/2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD UNDER G.M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

JAIPAL CHANDRABHAN SURYAWANSHI ...

Mr.Rohit B. Surwase h/f. Mr. B.R. Surwase - Advocate for Applicants ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 05.03.2025 PER COURT :

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1713 OF 2022 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1715 OF 2022 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1717 OF 2022 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1731 OF 2022 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant/acquiring body. 2.

All these applications are filed for condonation of delay periods mentioned therein. The respondents despite service remained absent. The learned Counsel for the applicant/acquiring body submits that all these appeals are only in respect of interest awarded by the learned Reference Court and some of the connected matters 2/3

are already kept before coming Lok Adalat. He intends to place these appeals before the Lok Adalat.

3.

As such, considering the statutory right of the applicant the delay periods mentioned in all these applications are condoned and all the appeals be registered after removal of office objections, if any. 4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. 5.

The appeals after registration alongwith pending Civil Applications, if any, be placed before the Lok Adalat dated 22.03.2025.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale 3/3