← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5679/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Sudarshan Rajendra Sarode v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-06-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

5679.16WP FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 5679 OF 2016 SUDARSHAN RAJENDRA SARODE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Chaitali R.

Choudhary Kutti AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.K. Kadam Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ravindra Pole ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: JUNE 27, 2016 ...

Pursuant to the notices issued to the Respondents, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed the affidavit in reply. In para 3 of the said affidavit in reply, the reference is made to the Notification issued by the State Government on 1st June, 2016. It is further stated in the said paragraph that the petitioner's apprehension that four marks will not be

5679.16WP calculated while calculating scored marks for the purpose of determination of his merit for the Health Science Course has been taken care of by the said Notification.

2.

In that view of the matter, though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner insists for keeping the Petition pending, we dispose of the same.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) sga/