Rukhsanabegum Allabaksha Baig And ANR. v. Nurunisa Allabaksha Baig.

-1- 2411.2017Cri.appln.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

923 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2411 OF 2017 IN REVNST/140/2017 RUKHSANABEGUM ALLABAKSHA BAIG AND ANR .. Applicants

VERSUS

NURUNISA ALLABAKSHA BAIG .. Respondent ...

Advocate for Applicants :

Shri Sudarshan J Salunke Advocate for Respondent :

Shri Balbhim R. Kedar ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 PER COURT :

1.

The delay of 20 days has occurred in filing the present application. For the reasons stated in the application which according to me are just and sufficient the delay is condoned. The learned Counsel for the respondent was also fair in submitting that, the delay be condoned and the application be heard on merits. Hence the following order.

ORDER

1.

The application is allowed.

2.

Revision be registered in accordance with law. 3.

Issue notice in the revision application to the respondent. Learned Counsel Shri B.R. Kedar waives service of notice for the respondent. 4.

List the criminal revision application for further consideration after vacation.

(P.R. BORA, J) ggp