Bombay High CourtWP/5749/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Tanaji Baliram Bansode And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-10-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane1 pages

{1} 954 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5749 OF 2016 TANAJI BALIRAM BANSODE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shrikant T. Veer AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S.S. Dande.

Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 : Mr. P.P. More, . . .

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 25TH OCTOBER, 2016.

PER COURT:

Policy framed by the respondents for facilitating mutual transfer of the employees does not permit transfer within the same Taluka. Petitioners are praying for issuance of directions to consider their joint application for mutual transfer within the same Taluka. 2] Since the request made is in violation of the policy prescribed by the Government, same cannot be considered. Writ petition being devoid of substance stands dismissed.

[K.K.SONAWANE] [R.M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-