Usha Shriram Sonore/ Usha Shrirang Janjal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7437 OF 2017 Sanjay Tribakrao Kamble, Age : 48 years, Occu. : Service, R/o Yashwant Nagar Old, Ausa Road, Behind Datta Mandir, Latur, Dist. Latur.

for Social welfare Ministry The General Manager, Sahityaratn Annabhau Sathe Arthik Vikas Mahamandal, Sahityaratn Annabhau Sathe Arthik Vikas Mahamandal, The respondents No.2 and 3 both Head Office New Administrative Building No.2, 3rd Floor, Ramkrishna Chemburkar Marg, Chembur (East) Mumbai.

(Copy to be served on the offence of Government Pleader High Court Bombay Bench at Aurangabad.) Shri B.R.Kedar, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.B.Girase, G.P. for State Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondent No.2 & 3 WRIT PETITION NO. 6573 OF 2017 Vishnu S/o Sonaji Sonawane, Age : 46 years, Occu. : Service, R/o Anand Nagar, Reogaon Road, Jalna.

Regional Office Aurangabad.

The District Manager / Office Assistant/Clerk, District Branch Office of At Aurangabad.

6.

The District Manager/ Office Assistant/Clerk, District Branch office of Vikas Mahamandal (Maryadit), At Jalna.

Shri M.B.Bharswadkar, A.G.P. for State Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondent No.6

WRIT PETITION NO. 6574 OF 2017 Tarachand s/o Vishwanath Kasabe, Age : 46 years, Occu. : Service, R/o Jalgaon, Tal.and Dist. Jalgaon.

Regional Office Nashik.

The District Manager / Office Assistant/Clerk, District Branch Office of At Jalgaon.

Shri A.V.Dheshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondents.

WRIT PETITION NO. 6577 OF 2017 Usha w/o Shriram Sonone/ Usha d/o Shrirang Janjal Age : 52 years, Occu. : Service, R/o Bhimnagar, Bausingpura, Aurangabad.

Regional Office Aurangabad.

Mrs M.A.Deshpande, A.G.P. for State Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondents

CORAM:

ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED:

7th June, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Anoop V. Mohta, J.)

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. We are inclined to dispose of all these writ petitions as similar points are agitated so also the grievances are basically against impugned order dated 18.02.2017 / 28.04.2017. The petitioners contend that, no show cause notice was given to them prior to issuance of the impugned orders.

We are inclined to permit petitioners to make representations to the concerned respondents within a period of 10 days. The respondents to deal with the same as early as possible and preferably within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of the representations.

Considering the facts and the circumstances as also the reasons recorded above, pending the decision on the representations, we direct that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners based upon the impugned orders till the communication of decision on their representations by the concerned respondents to the petitioners. All points are kept open.

Petitions are accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the decision if it is adverse. No costs. (SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (ANOOP V. MOHTA) JUDGE JUDGE vmk/