Sachin S/O. Nagraj Mhaske v. The State Of Maharashtra

686.19abappln etc (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.686 OF 2019 Sachin s/o Nagraj Mhaske ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.687 OF 2019 Karim s/o Sahebkha Pathan ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT Mr S. G. Sangle, A.P.P. for respondent CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J DATE : 14th December, 2020 PER COURT:

1.

The first application has been filed by Sachin Nagraj Mhaske and the second application has been filed by Karim Sahebkha Pathan. 2.

None present for the applicants.

3.

The learned Prosecutor places on record a communication received by him from Dr. R. S. Pawar, Police Sub-Inspector, Police Station, Waluj, Aurangabad City bearing outward No.1863, dated

686.19abappln etc (2) 01/07/2019. The said copy is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The learned Prosecutor points out from the last paragraph that the accused Sachin was arrested on 15-06-2019 and the accused Karim was arrested on 14-06-2019. He, therefore, submits that these two applications seeking anticipatory bail are rendered infructuous.

4.

In view of the above, both these applications are disposed off, as being infructuous. Needless to state, both the applicants are at liberty to avail of the legal remedies, as are available in law. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk