Snehal Chandrakant Pokharkar v. Nandkumar And Others

1 901-cp-407-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11715 OF 2017 Snehal Chandrakant Pokharkar ... Petitioner

Versus

Dr. Vandana Krishna ... Respondent ....

Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.G. Sangle, AGP for respondent.

....

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 18th OCTOBER, 2019 PER COURT :- 1.

Mr. Shelke, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner admits the position that in view of the reply filed on behalf of the respondent - the Education Officer (Secondary) Shri Laxman Sahebrao Pole, more particularly the annexure to the affidavit-in-reply at Exh."R-1", the order passed by this Court is now duly complied with and the grievance of the petitioner no more survives.

2.

In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. [ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. ] SMS