← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11533/2022delay condonatedrejected

Ahmadsab Maheboobsaheb Sayad And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Dist. Collector Nanded And ORS

2023-02-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

{1} ca11533.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11533 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 15752 OF 2020 Ahmadsab s/o Maheboobsaheb Sayad & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. Manish Dalave, advocate holding for Mr. K. M. Nagarkar, advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. W. Munde, AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. S. B. Patil, advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 23rd February, 2023.

PC :

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 196 days in fling this appeal.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is circulation delay also. Learned Counsel for the acquiring body, despite appearance, remained absent.

However, considering the statutory right of the

{2} ca11533.22.odt applicants, the delay of 196 days stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb