The State Of Maharashtra v. Dayanand S/O. Baburao Bade And ANR.

66 ca.8673.09.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8673 OF 2009 IN FAST/16962/2009 WITH CA/8675/2009 IN FAST/16957/2009 WITH CA/8677/2009 IN FAST/16865/2009 WITH CA/8679/2009 IN FAST/16972/2009 WITH CA/8681/2009 IN FAST/16968/2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

DAYANAND S/O. BABURAO BADE AND ANOTHER ...

AGP for Applicant : Mr.B.V.Virde.

Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Vijay G. Sakolkar. ...

CORAM :

V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATE :

04th January, 2017.

P.C.:

.

Heard the learned AGP for Applicant and the learned counsel for Respondent / original Claimant.

The learned AGP submits that though the proposal was sent for approval, same was received belatedly and therefore, the appeal could not be preferred within time.

The learned counsel for Respondent / original Claimant has strongly resisted the application.

66 ca.8673.09.odt In view of above submissions and for the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 451 days caused in filing the appeals is hereby condoned. Civil applications are accordingly disposed of. [ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] ndm