Ashokkumar Narayandas Tharani v. Hotel Sagar Proprietor Satish Darshanlal Jaiswal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8318 OF 2021 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10070 OF 2019 (Ashokkumar Narayandas Tharani Vs. Hotel Sagar, Proprietor Satish Darshanlal Jaiswal) ---- Mr. R.S. Wani, Advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant Mr. G.R. Syed, Advocate for the respondent ---- CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE :

20.08.2021 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

2.

Though the Writ Petition is disposed of, by order dated 23.08.2019, Civil Application No.10070/2019 was allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). However, it is pointed out that in the last line of the prayer clause, erroneously an incorrect figure has appeared as Rs.19,672.50. Learned Advocate Mr. Wani, holding for Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant submits that because of such an error in the prayer clause, the applicant is not being allowed to withdraw the money, which, in fact, is Rs.27,472.50.

ca8318-2021 3.

The request to carry out the amendment in prayer clause (B) in Civil Application No.10070/2019 as mentioned hereinabove is allowed. 4.

The Civil Application is disposed of.

[MANGESH S. PATIL] JUDGE npj/ca8318-2021