Hemant Kashinath Gaikwad v. Sau Surekha Hemant Gaikwad And ANR.

crra90.02 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATIONNO. 90 OF 2002 [Hemant Kashinath Gaikwad vs Sau. Surekha Hemant Gaikwad and anr.] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court's or Judge's orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri A.P.Bhandari, advocate for the applicant Shri V.P.Kale, A.P.P. for respondent/State Smt. C.E.Gaikwad, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2 .....

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

th February, 2015 DATED : 18 PER COURT :- 1] This motion is moved by the learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 for correcting the typographical mistake that has occurred in column

(3) of the operative order of the judgment of this court delivered on 30.1.2015. In clause (3) of the operative order, the date '27.2.2015' is appearing. It is a typing mistake. Instead of the same, it should appear and be read as '30.1.2015'.

crra90.02 2] Necessary correction be made accordingly. Motion disposed of.

[V.M.DESHPANDE, J.] dbm/crra90.02