← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3664/2022delay condonatedrejected

The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department Osmanabad And ORS v. Sampat Sadashiv Ingle

2022-04-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

1 907-CA-3666-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3666 OF 2022 IN FAST/17356/2021 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT OSMANABAD AND ORS

VERSUS

SHANTAPPA NARAYAN BIRAJDAR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent: Mr R.D. Biradar WITH 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3664 OF 2022 IN FAST/16821/2021 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT OSMANABAD AND ORS

VERSUS

SAMPAT SADASHIV INGLE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent: Mr R.D. Biradar WITH 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3668 OF 2022 IN FAST/17350/2021 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT OSMANABAD AND ORS

VERSUS

SHIVRAM BABRUWAN INGLE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent: Mr R.D. Biradar CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 28th APRIL, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

These are the applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicants/acquiring body.

2 907-CA-3666-2022 2.

Heard Mr S.G. Karlekar, learned counsel for the applicants/acquiring body and Mr R.D. Biradar, learned counsel for the respondent/original claimant in respective applications.

3.

There seems to be delay of 782 days in preferring the appeals in all the matters.

4.

Mr R.D. Biradar, learned counsel for the respondents/original claimants opposed to condone the delay.

5.

Mr S.G. Karlekar, learned counsel for the applicants/acquiring body submitted that the delay was not intentional. The delay was occurred for completing the formalities and obtaining sanction from the competent authority. He, therefore, urged to condone the delay.

6.

For the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay in para No. 3, it is necessary to condone the delay.

ORDER

(i) The applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicants/acquiring body are hereby allowed.

(ii) The Registry to make the scrutiny of the appeals as per procedure and thereafter, those be numbered and placed before the Court for admission.

(iii) The civil applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) mta