The Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority, Mumbai v. Madhusudan @ Madhukar Shriram And Others

CA6545.2014.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6545 OF 2014 IN FAST/16380/2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6543 OF 2014 IN FAST/16520/2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7926 OF 2014 IN FAST/16632/2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6541 OF 2014 IN FAST/16531/2014 MADHUSUDAN @ MADHUKAR SHRIAM AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AN AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUMBAI AND ANR .............

Mr C. K. Thombre & Mr A. B. Kadethankar, Advocate for applicants Mr R. R. Sancheti, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr D. V. Tele, AGP for respondent No. 3 / State ..............

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2015.

PER COURT:

.

Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2.

The learned Counsel for the respondents oppose the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is stated. The averments made in the applications are not controverted.

3.

For the reasons stated in the applications, same are allowed. Delay is condoned.

4.

Civil Applications stand disposed of.

[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] sgp