Sagar Anil Patil And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.470 OF 2020 WITH APPEAL/493/2020 RAJENDRA YESHWANT PATIL (BHURA PATIL)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for appellant Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for respondent No.1 Ms. Sheetal Waghmare, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No.2 ...

CORAM

:

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE :

08th OCTOBER, 2020 PER COURT :

A motion for speaking to minutes of Judgment dated 01.10.2020, passed in Criminal Appeal No.470 of 2020 with Criminal Appeal No.493 of 2020, is moved and a Circulation Note dated 08.10.2020 to that effect is also filed.

In the Judgment dated 01.10.2020 there is no order about fees of appointed Advocate. It has remained to be passed inadvertently. The sentence, "Fees of appointed Advocate is quantified at Rs.6,000/- for both matters collectively, to be paid by High Court Legal Services Sub Committee,

Cri.Appeal_470_2020 Aurangabad", be added in operative part of the Judgment. Corrections accordingly.

Motion for speaking to minutes stands disposed of. ( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. ) agd