← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6257/2021delay condonatedrejected

The Ex. Engineer, Irrigation Div. Beed v. Indubai Govinda Kapade And ANR

2023-07-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

926-CA-6257-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6257 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16897 OF 2021 WITH CA/10895/2022 IN FAST/16897/2021 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DIVISION BEED

VERSUS

INDUBAI GOVINDA KAPADE AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. A.D. Pawar - Advocate for Applicant Ms. Kirti Deshpande h/f. Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar - Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st July, 2023 PER COURT :

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6257 OF 2021 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant - acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay of 305 days, which appears to be caused due to obtaining sanctions at various stages. There is no strong objection from other side and therefore the delay of 305 days stands condoned.

3.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office Pooja K.

1/2

926-CA-6257-2021 objections, if any.

4.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10895 OF 2022 5.

Heard rival submissions.

6.

The applicant - acquiring body is seeking extension of time to deposit the amount of compensation as directed by this Court. It appears that, this Court had directed the applicant - acquiring body to deposit 50% of total compensation amount out of which only 25% amount has been deposited. The learned Counsel for the respondents - claimants though objected the application but considering the earlier deposition, the time to deposit the remaining 25% amount is extended by further period of eight weeks as last chance.

7.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2