Priyadarshnee Rahul Falke v. Rahul Annasaheb Falke

939-ca-7999-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7999 OF 2018 IN MCA/134/2017 PRIYADARSHNEE RAHUL FALKE

VERSUS

RAHUL ANNASAHEB FALKE ...

Advocate for the Applicant : Shri K. S. Patil h/f. Shri D. D. Sarawade Patil ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 8th FEBRUARY, 2019.

...

PER COURT :

1.

By this application, the applicant - wife prays for leave to correct grounds VI and VII in the disposed off MCA No. 134/2017.

2.

It is pointed out that instead of writing ''The father of the applicant is not in service'', the word ''not'' is missing from ground VI.

3.

It is also pointed out that the applicant inadvertently stated in ground VII that ''she has a two years minor daughter''. The learned Advocate for the husband agrees with the

939-ca-7999-18.odt applicant - wife that no child is born out of their marriage. 4.

Considering the above, the C.A. is allowed. The leave to correct ground VI by adding the word ''not'' and in ground VII by deleting the statement regarding a daughter, is permitted. 5.

Correction be carried out forthwith.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) shp/-