Bombay High CourtCRF/2/2015disposed offdismissed for default

The Commissioner Of Central Excise Aurangabad v. M/S. Jai Corporation Limited Sipta Coated Steels Division, Nanded

2017-04-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala1 pages

1 48-Ref-2.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 2 OF 2015 THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AURANGABAD

VERSUS

M/S. JAI CORPORATION LIMITED, SIPTA COATED STEELS DIVISION, NANDED -- Mr.D.S.Ladda, Advocate for petitioner Mr.R.M.Sharma, Advocate for respondent -- CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 07, 2017 PER COURT :

Mr.Ladda, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a Reference under Section 35G (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and not a Reference made by the CEGAT. The petitioner does not want to prosecute the present Reference as the amount is below Rs.Twenty Lakhs. 2.

In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Reference is disposed of. No costs.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] kbp