Bombay High CourtCA/12335/2011disposed offdismissed for default

Radhabai Vaijinath Utage v. The State Of Mah And ANR

2016-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde1 pages

ca12335.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12335 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1303 OF 2010 Radhabai Vaijinath Utage .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.B. Kale, advocate for applicant.

Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the State.

Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for respondent no. 2. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT :

This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 321 days occurred in filing cross objection. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting cross objection stands condoned Civil application stands disposed of.

( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb