← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6193/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Late Girish Yemul Baha Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Jalna Through Its President And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

( 1 ) 84 wp 6193.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 84 WRIT PETITION NO.6193 OF 2018 LATE GIRISH YEMUL BAHA UDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL JALNA THROUGH ITS PRESI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Panpatte V.S.

AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Aghav Avinash D for R/3 ...

CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

20.08.2019 P.C. :- Mr. Panpatte the learned counsel submits that the proposal is given in the year 2013 for sanction of additional division from 1st to 5th standard. The proposal was also moved for 1st to 7th standard on no grant basis. Earlier permission was granted on permanent no grant basis. The policy has undergone change. The Education Officer has also recommended to the Deputy Director in that behalf. Thereafter, the Block Education Officer has also given proposal to the Education Officer (Primary) for 20% grant in aid, however no decision has been taken on it as yet. 2.

We have heard the learned counsel for the respondents and the

( 2 ) 84 wp 6193.18 learned A.G.P.

3.

From the documents placed on record it appears that on or about 08.10.2013 the Education Officer (Primary) has forwarded proposal to the Deputy Director of Education to give sanction for class 1st to 7th on no grant basis (page 33). It also appears that the Block Education Officer has forwarded proposal to the Education Officer (Primary) for 20% grant in aid. It also appears that the proposal is moved for sanction of additional divisions for standard 1st to 5th and the said proposal is moved to the Education Officer.

4.

In case all the aforesaid proposals are pending, we direct the authorities to take necessary steps and forward the proposal to authorities who are empowered to take decision upon the same. The decision on the said proposals shall be taken by the concerned authorities on its own merits in accordance with law and policy positively within six months. 5.

With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] mub