← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/460/2023application allowed

Ajay Bhaskar Bhise v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2023-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi3 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 460 OF 2023 Ajay s/o Bhaskar Bhise age 28 years, occ. Agri.

r/o Pimpri Zola, Tq. Gangakhed Dist. Parbhani Appellant

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Gangakhed Dist. Parbhani.

2.

Subhash s/o Sopan Kamble age 40 years, occ. Labour r/o Pimpri (Zola), Tq. Gangakhed Dist. Parbhani.

Respondents Mr. J. M. Murkute, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, APP for the State.

Mr. Murrel Gomes, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No. 2. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 30th JUNE, 2023.

PER COURT :

1.

This appeal is fled challenging the order dated 26th April, 2023, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, Dist. Parbhani in Criminal M.A. No. 72/2023 thereby rejecting bail to the applicant/appellant herein in connection with Crime No. 0132/2023 registered with Gangakhed Police Station, Dist. Parbhani for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 323, 504 of the

- 2 - Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act.

2.

There is no dispute about the fact that the investigating into the crime is already completed with fling of the charge-sheet. Having regard to the nature of offence, the appellant need not be detailed in jail.

3.

Learned APP and learned counsel for the informant submitted that there are eight criminal cases pending against the present applicant and that he has not appeared in said proceedings before the concerned Court which has resulted into issuance of nonbailable warrant against him. 4.

In response thereto, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, undertakes that not only in the present case but in all cases fling against him, the appellant shall attend the Court regularly unless exempted is obtained from concerned Court. Undertaking is accepted. This undertaking will suffce the purpose of the prosecution and takes care of the possibility of abscondance of

- 3 - the appellant. Furthermore, appellant cannot be kept behind bar by way of pre-trial punishment.

5.

In view of above, appeal is allowed. Hence, the following order :-

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed.

(ii) Appellant be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount in connection with Crime No. 0132/2023 registered with Gangakhed Police Station, Dist. Parbhani for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act.

(iii) Bail before Trial Court.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb