Ashwini Baliram Chenalwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

915. WRIT PETITION NO.6879 OF 2018 Ashwini d/o. Baliram Chenalwad, Age-30 Years, Occ: Service, Serving as Assistant Teacher, R/o. At Post Sarsam [Bk.], Tq.Himayatnagar, Dist. Nanded.

At present R/o. Shri Madhavrao Bhosale Junior College Matola, Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur.

.. PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad Through its Deputy Director/Member 3.

The Deputy Director of Education Latur Division, Latur.

4.

The Education Officer [Secondary], Zilla Parishad, Latur.

5.

Dnyan Prasarak Mandal Yermala, Tq.Kallam, Dist. Osmanabad.

Through its President/Secretary 6.

Shri Madhavrao Bhosale, Junior College, Matola, Tq.Ausa, Dist. Latur through its Principal. .. RESPONDENTS

...

Mr.V.C.Patil Ashtekar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.R.P.Gaur, AGP for Respondent - State ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K.SONAWANE,JJ.

DATE : 06.12.2018 ORDER:

1] Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 22nd November, 2018, the Registrar [Judicial] has called the status report of SMBJR-2013-2014/81 [Chenalwad Ashwini Baliram]. In response to the same, respondent no.2 communicated to the Registrar [Judicial] that, the tribe claim of the petitioner will be decided by respondent no.2, by the end of December, 2018. In that view of the matter, in our opinion, further adjudication of this Petition is not necessary.

However, protection needs to be granted to the petitioner, till the decision is taken by the Committee.

2] In that view of the matter, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner on the ground of her failure to submit the tribe validity certificate till the end of December, 2018, or till the decision is taken by the Committee, which would occur first.

3] Needless to observe that, the petitioner shall extend full co-operation to respondent no.2 for early decision of her tribe claim.

4] With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

5] Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

[K.K.SONAWANE] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC