← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9301/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Madhav Sudamrao Tangade v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Mumbai And Another

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

37-WP-9301-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9301 OF 2013 Madhav S/o Sudamrao Tangade ... Petitioner.

Versus

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and others ... Respondents.

....

None for the Petitioner.

Ms. Harshita M. Mangalni, Advocate h/f Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Ms. D.S. Jape, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

....

CORAM :

T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2018 PER COURT:- 1.

Nobody present for the petitioner. This Court has considered the point involved in the matter and the said case is reported in 2013 (2) All MR 841 (Jagannath Khakare & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra). In that proceeding also the age relaxation was claimed by the petitioner for his consideration on the post advertised by the respondent-company. This Court held that the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company incorporated under Companies Act is not bound to follow the age relaxation and such relaxation cannot be given to the 'project/earthquake' affected persons. Thus it is held that there

37-WP-9301-2013 is no right is created in favour of such persons against the respondent-company.

2.

In view of the said decision, the present petition is disposed of of the same reason.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE SPR