Rahul Vitthal Misal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:17657 (1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 378 OF 2025 RAHUL VITTHAL MISAL ....Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Mr. V. S. Wakale, Advocate for the appellant Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, APP for the respondents/State Mr. V. d. Karande, Advocate for the respondent No.2 (appointed) CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 09th JULY, 2025 P. C.
1.
Heard the parties.
2.
The present appellant has approached this court seeking bail in connection with Crime No. 0210/2024 registered with Ambhora Police Station, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable under Sections 64, 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2) and 3(v) of the Atrocities Act.
(2) 3.
Now the informant has filed an affidavit stating that she had filed a complaint under misconception and due to political rivalry. Due to intervention of the elderly persons of the village the victim-informant decided to settle the dispute amicably. It is further stated in the affidavit that the affidavit is being signed and prepared in the present of the husband of the informant. She has thus given no objection to release the appellant on bail.
4.
Considering that the victim herself has stated that the complaint was filed due to misconception and due to political rivalry, this court finds that appellant be released on bail. Considering above, the appeal stands allowed. 5.
The appellant be released on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime No. 0210/2024 registered with Ambhora Police Station, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable under Sections 64, 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352,
(3) 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2) and 3(v) of the Atrocities Act, on executing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- [Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only] with one solvent surety on following conditions.
a] The appellant shall attend the police station as and when called by the concerned Investigating Officer/Police station.
b] The appellant shall stay away from Hatolan, Tq. Ashti, Dist. Beed till the trial is over except attending the police station.
c] The appellant shall not try to contact in any manner the informant and prosecution witnesses. d] He shall give the contact details, mobile numbers & address etc to the concerned Investigating Officer.
[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] VishalK/908criapl378.25