Mangal Ramhari Shelke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 6687.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6687 OF 2019 Devram Chendu Bende .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6689 OF 2019 Usha Devram Dhindhale .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6698 OF 2019 Mangal Ramhari Shelke .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2019 Shashikala Kundalik Ghane .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri Majit S. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters. Ms. R. P. Gaur, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in W. P. No. 6687/2019.

Shri V. S. Badakh, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in W. P. No. 6689/2019.

Shri S. D. Ghayal, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in W. P. No. 6698/2019.

2 wp 6687.19 Shri P. S. Patil, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in W. P. No. 6735/2019.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2019.

FINAL ORDER :

.

We have heard Mr. Kakade, the learned advocate for petitioners.

2.

In fact, the orders impugned viz imposing penalty upon the petitioners are appealable before the Commissioner under the provisions of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules. The further aspects about transfers are consequential to the orders of punishment imposed upon the petitioners. Depending upon the orders that would be passed by the Commissioner, further consequences would follow. If petitioners approaches the Commissioner, the Commissioner shall decide the appeals of petitioners on its own merits and expeditiously. All contentions of respective parties are kept open.

5.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/June 19